Consensus & Conflict Department

In post-migrant democracies, recognition and participation are continually negotiated within the context of social plurality. The resulting dynamics of consensus and conflict form the focus of our research and outreach activities. We view consensus and conflict as normatively open processes that can drive both social cohesion and polarization and fragmentation. Our work is empirically oriented and uses a multi-method approach to examine the causes, trajectories, and consequences of these negotiation processes, as well as how they intensify and come to a head against the backdrop of social crises and upheavals. 

Our research helps us better understand the interplay between conflict and consensus—how do these processes arise, and what are their societal implications? Social inequalities play a central role in this context: they shape lines of conflict, influence the formation of consensus, and thus determine how inclusive and resilient pluralistic democracy is.
Dr. Friederike Römer, Leitung Abt. Konsens & Konflikt

The department’s research and outreach activities are divided into three main areas of focus: 

  • (Anti-)pluralistic Attitudes and Practices 

    The plurality of social and cultural backgrounds, lived environments, and political preferences in post-migrant societies forms the starting point for this research focus. The research examines how individuals perceive, evaluate, and help shape society and processes of social transformation. Since plurality is a socially contested concept, both perspectives that support and those that reject plurality are taken into account. 

  • Post-migrant civil society in transition 

    This research focus centers on how civil society organizations and social movements deal with the reality of social plurality. The analysis examines various forms of action—from protest as a visible indicator of social conflicts to voluntary engagement—with a particular focus on (pro-)migrant and anti-racist actors as well as antagonistic counter-mobilizations. In doing so, both internal dynamics within civil society and their reverberations in public debates and political institutions are taken into account. 

  • Contested Plurality in Institutions and Discourses 

    Public institutions and discourses are both the result of and the structuring framework for negotiation processes concerning recognition and participation. They thus possess significant potential to shape post-migrant societies. Against this backdrop, the projects in this research focus examine how plurality is promoted or hindered in institutions and discourses. Particular attention is paid to state institutions and both traditional and digital media.  

 

 

A selection of key publications from the Consensus & Conflict Division

Department projects

Number of projects: 40

Department employees